T20 Global Batting Analysis

Who can actually finish a T20? The world's leading T20 batters, separated by the role they play. Openers build through volume — finishers detonate the back end. Compare any batter against their real peers, not the wrong yardstick.

\U0001F1F3\U0001F1FF

Bevon-John Jacobs

View on ESPNcricinfo
Qualifying players only
Default: Current players with 15+ innings. Filters out small samples like Keene & Stackpole — flick the switch to include everyone.

BJ at a glance

benchmarked against the 4–6 cohort
👆 The blue tile is the headline composite. Click any KPI to jump to its full ranking.

BJ vs the 4–6 benchmark

Side-by-side on the four yellow KPIs that drive Batting Value Points

Scoring DNA

Where BJ's runs come from

BJ's percentile rank within the 4–6 field

100 = best of all qualifying 4–6 batters, 0 = lowest. Higher is better.

The Big 4 & their composite

Career Average + Strike Rate + Boundary % + At Bat Value, averaged → Batting Value Points
Batting Value Points (BVP) is the single number that summarises a batter's worth across four dimensions: how often they get out (Average), how fast they score (Strike Rate), how much of their output comes from boundaries (Boundary %), and how productively they use each crease appearance (At Bat Value). Each weighs equally — BVP = (Avg + SR + Bnd% + ABV) ÷ 4. The radar below shows the focus player's shape vs the tier average.

BJ — Big 4 radar

Each axis is normalised to the qualifying tier max so the shape is comparable

How the composite is built

Each KPI's contribution to the focus player's BVP (each component / 4)

Top 20 Batting Value Points (qualifying)

The blue composite, ranked. Stacked by which of the Big 4 contributes most.

Six-hitting signatures

three views of the same skill: frequency, intensity, opportunity
Three different lenses on six-hitting capture different things: Sixes per innings rewards finishers who clear the rope often; Balls per six rewards efficiency — lower is more destructive; Balls per innings tells you who simply gets more chances to do it. The longer you bat, the more sixes you'll hit — but the elite finishers do it on fewer balls.

Sixes per innings

How often each batter clears the rope. Higher is more destructive.

Balls per six

Efficiency. Lower means a six every fewer deliveries.

Balls per innings

Time at the crease. Openers naturally face more.

The "longer you bat, the more sixes" thesis

Balls per innings vs sixes per innings. Each dot is a batter; the focus player is highlighted. There's a positive relationship — but the most destructive finishers sit above the trend (more sixes than their balls faced suggests).
1–3 openers 4–6 finishers BJ Jacobs
Top-3 batters and 4–6 batters are not doing the same job. Openers face the new ball, bat more deliveries per innings, and build an average through volume. The 4–6 group come in later, face fewer balls, and are asked to accelerate immediately. Judging a finisher by an opener's yardstick — or vice versa — misreads the role. The numbers below show how the two tiers diverge.

Tier averages, side by side

mean of every qualifying batter in each group

Balls faced per innings

Openers simply get more time at the crease

Six-hitting intensity

Sixes per innings · finishers clear the rope more often

Strike rate vs average — the role signature

Each dot is a batter. The two clouds sit in different places — that's the 1–3 / 4–6 split, visualised. The selected batter is highlighted.
Top 3 (1–3) Bottom 3 (4–6) BJ Jacobs

Leaderboards

pick any metric · the selected batter is highlighted

Origins of the global field

click a country to filter the table below

Full data explorer

every batter · click a column to sort · click a row to set focus · search by name